Further observations of Dexcom’s G7.

Having tested a G7 against the Libre3, and found that without calibration, it tended to produce results that I wasn’t satisfied with using just the factory calibration, I thought I’d have another go and see where we got to.

This is one that was ordered from the UK website, and applied according to the user guide on my arm.

The reference data recording wasn’t as methodical as the capture for the previous study, but the results were very far from what I was expecting.

The MARD Vs fingerprick with this device was 22.3% and the MRD was 15.9% (using the same Contour Next blood testing system that was previously used), indicating that in general it read considerably higher than the reference finger pricks (and the G6 it was sitting next to). There are only 28 matched pairs here, so statistically it’s an irrelevance.

Consensus error Grid for Dexcom G7 retest.

As is clear from the grid shown, the dispersion of the very few points collected was quite wide, with only 62% of the readings falling within zone A.

Modified Bland-Altman using 20/20 thresholds

The modified Bland-Altman plot shows the dispersion in relation to the 20/20 boundaries. It’s clear that quite a number were a long way outside. It’s fair to say that this sensor did not perform well.

Additionally, the device fell off after 6 days.

What’s going on?

I’m not sure. This is the second device that I’ve used with readings that were a long way off when using the factory calibration, and also the second that fell off early (one with and one without the overlay patch).

I submitted an issue and have a replacement sensor coming, which I’ll check again. If I still see the same problems, then I assume that I don’t get on with the G7 as well as I did the G6.

But why might that be the case? One of the major differences between the G7 and the G6 is the orientation of the sensor wire, which is now vertical, compared to the angled entry of the G6. It’s possible that this could be interacting with me in a way that causes movement within the “sheath” and affects the results.

Having said all of that, anecdotal observation of the G6 and ONE systems that I have historically used has also recently shown a higher level of variation than I have been used to with the factory calibration. At least once in the life of a sensor, I am now checking and calibrating. Something seems to have changed, but I can only assume it’s me, as I can’t imagine that the devices are being manufactured or set up differently.

The only answer seems to be that further tests are probably required.


    • The interesting thing here is that I didn’t do MARD per day. By far the worst was on day 3, and days 3-5 were all worse than 1 and 2.

      • Maybe then it was the sensor itself that wasn’t great?

        Also like you mentioned, if you’re on the slimmer side of things that certainly has effect on the sensor imo.
        I’m quite far from the slim side and out of maybe 15-20 sensors (I had some replacements due to the glue being sh*t mostly) I’d say about 90% were excellent.
        Sometimes I do need to calibrate, but when I do it’s likely because the sensor is on its way out.
        For me cheaper cost than G6, slimmer profile (I’m way too clumsy for the G6 on my arm, sigh), no external transmitter and painless application (out of all of my sites, only 1 was actually “somewhat painful” the others I did not feel them at all. The G6 wasn’t painful per se, but I always flinched and felt it. The G7 I don’t feel a thing!) win for me.

        Given all of the above and the usual reliability I would be really gutted to have to switch back to G6 or dexcom one for that matter.

        A tip I can give with calibration to bring it as close as possible to the BG is if your sensor is trending higher and your BG is 5.6 I’d input 5.3 and then the sensor is bang on with the meter 95% of the time for me. I do the same thing in reverse for low trending.

  1. I am glad I am not the only one seeing this, I moved to the Dexcom one due to cost and have seen a lot of sensors high. In fact I replaced 6 out of 8 of my sensors in the first batch, in the end I got them to replace the transmitter as the sensors were consistently out by the same amount, around 1.5 – 2 mmol high. Transmitter change helped a bit, maybe I had transmitter on the high side of tolerance too, but still seem to read a little high. Of course on the One you cannot calibrate either ..

  2. Interesting as always. I have not had the opportunity to try the G7 yet (either personally or clinically) but I have tried to One. I was not that impressed with this device ( failed after 5 days) and the glucose readings were not as close to CBG as Libre 2.
    I do not have diabetes, but feel its important as a clinician to have a physical understanding of these devices when recommending to patients.
    I have tried Libre 3 and I was quite impressed by this, small, accurate and reliable; its only failure being lack of pump integration ( currently at least). At the moment I know which sensor I am recommending to patients, unless evidence begins to show otherwise.

    • The One is identical hardware to the G6. The only differences are the software (which stops you calibrating it, but the transmitter can take calibrations via Open Source tools), the serial number (which stops you connecting it to an AID system, and One-specific calibration codes, which map to equivalent G6 codes, so the sensors can be used with both G6 and One transmitters.

    • The x-axis shows the reference blood glucose value. The y-axisbis the CGM value.

      If the data point is above the 45 degree line, then the CGM reading is higher than the blood reading, and vice versa.
      The zones A-E reflect the level of accuracy. High numbers of readings in zone A and less so B are a good thing reflecting high levels of correlation with the reference data.

      Once you start seeing values in zone C-E you have to question the number of them and the safety of dosing insulin from the device.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Additional observations of Dexcom’s G7. - All Health Books

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.